Core i5-3317U vs FX 4100
Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 41.3 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4100 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 41.3 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4100 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
600f12
Core
Ivy Bridge
Zambezi
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2012
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
44.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3317U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.11k
7.65k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
6.58k
6.9k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.48k
2.88k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.71k
4.75k (x1.75)
TOTAL
17.88k
22.18k (x1.24)
Multithread
i5-3317U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
15.53k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
16.8k
15.13k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.66k
7.98k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
5.67k (x1.36)
TOTAL
41.31k
44.31k (x1.07)
Performance/W
i5-3317U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
804 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
392 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
246 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
2430 points/W
466 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2351 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2532 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
953 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
6879 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4