| | | | | | |

Core i5-3317U vs Athlon 5150 APU


Description
The i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3317U gets a score of 41.3 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.4 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
700f01
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kabini
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
AM1
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.31k points
30.06k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3317U
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
6.11k
3.02k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
6.58k
2.62k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.48k
1.59k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.71k
1.02k (x0.38)
TOTAL
17.88k
8.26k (x0.46)

Multithread

i5-3317U

5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
12.06k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
16.8k
10.42k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.66k
6.32k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
1.26k (x0.3)
TOTAL
41.31k
30.06k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i5-3317U
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
804 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
988 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
392 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
246 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
2430 points/W
1203 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3317U
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2351 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2532 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
953 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
6879 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4