Core i5-3210M vs Pentium G3260
Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
35 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
24.9k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.73k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
8.59k
11.73k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
10.45k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
4.55k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
3.83k (x1.11)
TOTAL
24.51k
30.56k (x1.25)
Multithread
i5-3210M
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
22.99k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
20.53k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.93k
8.82k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
6.55k (x1.43)
TOTAL
53.67k
58.89k (x1.1)
Performance/W
i5-3210M
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
577 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
570 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
1533 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2864 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1114 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
7908 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4