Core i5-3210M vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 2.1 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 2.1 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
10676
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
24.9k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.73k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
8.59k
3k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
6.62k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
2.55k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
3.6k (x1.04)
TOTAL
24.51k
15.77k (x0.64)
Multithread
i5-3210M
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
5.83k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
12.64k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.93k
4.97k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
1.95k (x0.42)
TOTAL
53.67k
25.39k (x0.47)
Performance/W
i5-3210M
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
577 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
570 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
1533 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2864 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1114 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
7908 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4