| | | |

Core i5-3210M vs M-5Y10c


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 55.1 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.1 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306d4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
Jun 2012
October 2014

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3210M
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
10149
7223 (-28.83%)
Test#2 (FP)
9489
9981 (5.19%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3801
2748 (-27.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3799
2983 (-21.48%)
TOTAL
27238
22935 (-15.80%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
20114
15072 (-25.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
22651
24799 (9.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8928
6676 (-25.23%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3426
4456 (30.04%)
TOTAL
55119
51002 (-7.47%)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
575 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
1575 points/W
10200 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3061 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1226 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1226 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
8786 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8