| | | | | | |

Core i5-2520M vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2520M gets a score of 50.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
406f1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.13k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.23k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2520M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.69k
2.6k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
7.55k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
2.61k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
2.03k (x0.66)
TOTAL
16.86k
14.79k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-2520M

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
17.41k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
16.15k
75.46k (x4.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.87k
26.25k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
4.65k (x1.52)
TOTAL
34.15k
123.78k (x3.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2520M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.04k
6.04k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
8.03k
10.18k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.74k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
2.41k (x0.8)
TOTAL
24.13k
21.37k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-2520M

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.82k
47.51k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
75.12k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
19.72k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
5.45k (x1.78)
TOTAL
50.23k
147.8k (x2.94)

Performance/W
i5-2520M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
566 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
518 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
88 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
1739 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2520M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2826 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2510 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
935 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
7540 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4