Core i5-2520M vs Xeon E5-1660 v4
Description
The i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2520M gets a score of 50.2 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.4 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2520M gets a score of 50.2 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.4 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
406f1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2011
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.13k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.23k points
320.49k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2520M
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.04k
12.41k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
8.03k
17.23k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.89k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
3.07k (x1.03)
TOTAL
24.13k
37.6k (x1.56)
Multithread
i5-2520M
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.82k
102.11k (x5.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
156.5k (x8.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
42.08k (x4.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
19.8k (x6.46)
TOTAL
50.23k
320.49k (x6.38)
Performance/W
i5-2520M
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
566 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
518 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
88 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
2289 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2520M
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2826 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2510 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
935 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
7540 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4