| | | | | | |

Core i5-2520M vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2520M gets a score of 50.2 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 134.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 2.7 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
906e9
Core
Sandy Bridge
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
24.13k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.23k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2520M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.69k
3.41k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
14.14k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.84k
4.41k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
8.87k (x2.9)
TOTAL
16.86k
30.83k (x1.83)

Multithread

i5-2520M

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6.08k
12.75k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.15k
52.88k (x3.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.87k
16.25k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
8.98k (x2.94)
TOTAL
34.15k
90.85k (x2.66)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2520M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.04k
11.59k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
8.03k
17.89k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.14k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
7.88k (x2.64)
TOTAL
24.13k
41.5k (x1.72)

Multithread

i5-2520M

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
19.82k
44.42k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
67.5k (x3.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
14.6k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.06k
8.06k (x2.63)
TOTAL
50.23k
134.58k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i5-2520M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
566 points/W
987 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
518 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
324 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
88 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
2991 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2520M
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2826 points/GHz
3310 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2510 points/GHz
5112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
935 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
TOTAL
7540 points/GHz
11857 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4