| | | | | | |

Core i5-2500K vs i5-4460


Description
The i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the i5-4460 gets 112.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4460 is 1 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306c3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2011
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
32.85k points
39.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
111.83k points
140.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2500K
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
11.84k
12.12k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.43k
10.69k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
4.71k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.36k
3.87k (x0.72)
TOTAL
32.85k
31.39k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-2500K

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
45.51k
45.75k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
40.83k
42.71k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
17.81k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
6.08k (x1.27)
TOTAL
111.83k
112.35k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-2500K
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
545 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
430 points/W
508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
218 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
1177 points/W
1338 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2500K
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/GHz
3565 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2818 points/GHz
3143 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1385 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1449 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
TOTAL
8878 points/GHz
9232 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4