| | | | | | |

Core i5-2500K vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 98.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
706e5
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.85k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
111.83k points
116.63k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2500K
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
11.84k
11.93k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.43k
16.99k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
6.43k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.36k
4.59k (x0.86)
TOTAL
32.85k
39.93k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-2500K

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
45.51k
29.07k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
40.83k
46.14k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
19.47k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
4.18k (x0.87)
TOTAL
111.83k
98.86k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i5-2500K
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
1938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
430 points/W
3076 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
218 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
1177 points/W
6591 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2500K
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/GHz
3510 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2818 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1449 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
8878 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4