Core i5-2500K vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
810f81
Core
Sandy Bridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2011
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.85k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
111.83k points
168.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2500K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.84k
13.05k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.43k
22.88k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
5.39k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.36k
7.31k (x1.36)
TOTAL
32.85k
48.63k (x1.48)
Multithread
i5-2500K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
45.51k
51.73k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
40.83k
87.74k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
20.74k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
6.57k (x1.37)
TOTAL
111.83k
166.79k (x1.49)
Performance/W
i5-2500K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
796 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
430 points/W
1350 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
218 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
1177 points/W
2566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2500K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/GHz
3262 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2818 points/GHz
5719 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1449 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
8878 points/GHz
12157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4