Core i5-2500 vs m7-6Y75
Description
The i5-2500 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500 gets a score of 86.9 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500 is 1.6 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500 gets a score of 86.9 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500 is 1.6 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
406e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2011
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.61k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.86k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
10.24k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
8.8k
15.33k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
2.97k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
5.32k (x1.15)
TOTAL
27.61k
33.86k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-2500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
35.79k
16.78k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
31.77k
25.09k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
6.14k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
5.58k (x1.47)
TOTAL
86.86k
53.58k (x0.62)
Performance/W
i5-2500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
377 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
163 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
40 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
914 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2500
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
2682 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2377 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
7461 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4