Core i5-2467M vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
406f1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
17 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2011
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
14.78k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.78k points
237.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2467M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.4k
6.04k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
4.9k
10.18k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
2.74k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
2.41k (x1.15)
TOTAL
14.78k
21.37k (x1.45)
Multithread
i5-2467M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
47.51k (x4.07)
Test#2 (FP)
10.74k
75.12k (x6.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
19.72k (x3.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.28k
5.45k (x2.39)
TOTAL
29.78k
147.8k (x4.96)
Performance/W
i5-2467M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
632 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1752 points/W
1739 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2467M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2129 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
907 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
6424 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4