Core i5-2467M vs i5-10400T
Description
The i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.9 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.9 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
17 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
14.78k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.78k points
307.18k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2467M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.4k
12.5k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
4.9k
19.05k (x3.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
4.72k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
10.3k (x4.94)
TOTAL
14.78k
46.57k (x3.15)
Multithread
i5-2467M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
74.58k (x6.39)
Test#2 (FP)
10.74k
126.96k (x11.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
31.76k (x6.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.28k
2.5k (x1.09)
TOTAL
29.78k
235.8k (x7.92)
Performance/W
i5-2467M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
632 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1752 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2467M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2129 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
907 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
6424 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4