Core i5-2467M vs FX 8320
Description
The i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 8320 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 3.5 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 3.5 times faster than the i5-2467M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
600f20
Core
Sandy Bridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
17 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2011
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
14.78k points
16.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.78k points
103.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2467M
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
5.4k
5.35k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
4.9k
5.14k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
2.15k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
4.04k (x1.94)
TOTAL
14.78k
16.68k (x1.13)
Multithread
i5-2467M
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
36.79k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
10.74k
40.2k (x3.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
19.57k (x3.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.28k
6.66k (x2.91)
TOTAL
29.78k
103.21k (x3.47)
Performance/W
i5-2467M
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/W
294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
632 points/W
322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
1752 points/W
826 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2467M
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2129 points/GHz
1285 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
907 points/GHz
1010 points/GHz
TOTAL
6424 points/GHz
4171 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4