| | | | | | |

Core i5-2450M vs i3-6100


Description
The i5-2450M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2450M gets a score of 43.4 k points while the i3-6100 gets 94.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-2450M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
506e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
22.85k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
43.44k points
112.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2450M
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.39k
13.78k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
7.65k
21.21k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
5.2k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.17k
3.73k (x1.18)
TOTAL
22.85k
43.92k (x1.92)

Multithread

i5-2450M

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
17.96k
29.02k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
14.71k
49.55k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.51k
12.3k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
3.28k (x1)
TOTAL
43.44k
94.15k (x2.17)

Performance/W
i5-2450M
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
569 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
420 points/W
972 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
215 points/W
241 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1241 points/W
1846 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2450M
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
3723 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2468 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1174 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1022 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
TOTAL
7370 points/GHz
11871 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4