| | | | | | |

Core i5-2430M vs i3-6006U


Description
The i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2430M gets a score of 40.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
406e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2011
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
22.21k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.76k points
67.91k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2430M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.04k
7.34k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.37k
11.37k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.53k
2.74k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.08k (x0.94)
TOTAL
22.21k
24.53k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-2430M

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.74k
15.32k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
25.61k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.16k
6.36k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
2.58k (x0.68)
TOTAL
40.76k
49.87k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i5-2430M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
450 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
205 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
1165 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2430M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2680 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1091 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
7404 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4