| | | | | | |

Core i5-2430M vs i3-10100T


Description
The i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2430M gets a score of 40.8 k points while the i3-10100T gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 4.3 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
22.21k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.76k points
227.67k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2430M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.04k
13.88k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
7.37k
20.94k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.53k
5.18k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
8.2k (x2.51)
TOTAL
22.21k
48.19k (x2.17)

Multithread

i5-2430M

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.74k
54.88k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
93.17k (x6.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.16k
23.34k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.85k (x1.01)
TOTAL
40.76k
175.24k (x4.3)

Performance/W
i5-2430M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
450 points/W
844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
205 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
1165 points/W
2696 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2430M
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2680 points/GHz
3228 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/GHz
4869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1091 points/GHz
1907 points/GHz
TOTAL
7404 points/GHz
11208 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4