Core i5-2430M vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2430M gets a score of 40.8 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.6 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2430M gets a score of 40.8 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.6 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
810f10
Core
Sandy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
22.21k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.76k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2430M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.04k
13.04k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
7.37k
22.35k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.53k
5.37k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.4k (x1.04)
TOTAL
22.21k
44.15k (x1.99)
Multithread
i5-2430M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.74k
56.49k (x3.59)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
100.74k (x7.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.16k
28.21k (x3.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.04k (x0.8)
TOTAL
40.76k
188.49k (x4.62)
Performance/W
i5-2430M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
450 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
205 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1165 points/W
2900 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2430M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2680 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1091 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
7404 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4