| | | | | | |

Core i5-2430M vs A9 9420


Description
The i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2430M gets a score of 40.8 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2430M is 1.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
670f00
Core
Sandy Bridge
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
22.21k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.76k points
46.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2430M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
8.04k
7.55k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
7.37k
13.9k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.53k
3.11k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
2.18k (x0.67)
TOTAL
22.21k
26.74k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-2430M

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
15.74k
9.09k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
12.25k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.16k
3k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
1.81k (x0.47)
TOTAL
40.76k
26.15k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i5-2430M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
450 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
205 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
1165 points/W
1743 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2430M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2680 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1091 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
7404 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4