Core i5-2410M vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
10676
Core
Sandy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2011
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
2.88k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
6.31k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
2.53k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
1.35k (x0.5)
TOTAL
20.52k
13.08k (x0.64)
Multithread
i5-2410M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
5.45k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
11.5k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
4.02k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
1.05k (x0.35)
TOTAL
36.9k
22.02k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i5-2410M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4