| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Xeon X5675


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the X5675 is 3.4 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
206c2
Core
Sandy Bridge
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2011
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
124.92k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
8.77k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
5.82k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.47k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
2.98k (x1.1)
TOTAL
20.52k
21.04k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-2410M

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
53.23k (x3.9)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
39.35k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
27.05k (x3.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.28k (x1.75)
TOTAL
36.9k
124.92k (x3.39)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4