| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Xeon X3430


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
106e5
Core
Sandy Bridge
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2011
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
55.66k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2410M
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
1.75k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
3.95k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
2.29k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
2.66k (x0.84)
TOTAL
15.62k
10.65k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-2410M

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
6.81k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
14.39k
15.37k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
8.9k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
4.42k (x1.43)
TOTAL
31.35k
35.49k (x1.13)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
6.41k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
4.27k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
2.38k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
2.67k (x0.99)
TOTAL
20.52k
15.74k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-2410M

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
25.19k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
16.76k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
9.33k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
4.37k (x1.45)
TOTAL
36.9k
55.66k (x1.51)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
586 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4