| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Xeon W3530


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.

Summarizing, the W3530 is 2 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
106a5
Core
Sandy Bridge
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
72.77k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
7.51k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
4.93k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.02k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
2.74k (x1.01)
TOTAL
20.52k
18.2k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-2410M

W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
31.33k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
23.11k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
15.78k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.55k (x0.85)
TOTAL
36.9k
72.77k (x1.97)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
560 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4