| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Xeon E5-2620


Description
Both models i5-2410M and E5-2620 are based on Sandy Bridge architecture.

"Sandy Bridge codename was originally ""Gesher"". The development began in 2005 and four years later, the first Sandy Bridge CPU was presented. The most prominent features are Intel Turbo Boost 2.0, AES encryption and SHA-1 hashing acceleration, Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) 256-bit instruction set and the ability to have up to 8 physical cores or 16 logical cores through Hyper-Threading."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 5.8 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
206d7
Core
Sandy Bridge
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
15360 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
224.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2410M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
7.38k
6.95k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.76k
6.24k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
3.05k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
2.56k (x0.96)
TOTAL
20.1k
18.8k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-2410M

E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
14.17k
90.01k (x6.35)
Test#2 (FP)
14.71k
82.43k (x5.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
42.59k (x6.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.87k
9.66k (x3.37)
TOTAL
38.68k
224.7k (x5.81)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
420 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
198 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
1105 points/W
2365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
2543 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2332 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1139 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
917 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
6932 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4