| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Pentium 4417U


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
806ea
Core
Sandy Bridge
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
41.15k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
7.94k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
11.35k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
2.39k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
2.8k (x1.03)
TOTAL
20.52k
24.49k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-2410M

4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
13.1k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
21.1k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
4.49k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.46k (x0.81)
TOTAL
36.9k
41.15k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
2743 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4