| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs i5-5200U


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306d4
Core
Sandy Bridge
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
68.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2410M
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.67k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
9.37k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
3.13k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
2.59k (x0.82)
TOTAL
15.62k
17.76k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-2410M

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
4.16k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
14.39k
19.01k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
6.48k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.96k (x0.96)
TOTAL
31.35k
32.61k (x1.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2410M
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.38k
8.48k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
6.76k
12.03k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
3.32k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
2.79k (x1.05)
TOTAL
20.1k
26.62k (x1.32)

Multithread

i5-2410M

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.17k
15.19k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
14.71k
25.99k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
6.71k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.87k
2.96k (x1.03)
TOTAL
38.68k
50.85k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
420 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
198 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
1105 points/W
3390 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2543 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2332 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1139 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
917 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
6932 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4