| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Celeron N4100


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.

Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
706a1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
February 2011
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
40.57k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
4.72k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
6.99k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
2.69k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
2.81k (x1.04)
TOTAL
20.52k
17.21k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-2410M

N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
12.54k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
17.99k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
6.71k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.33k (x1.1)
TOTAL
36.9k
40.57k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
6762 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4