| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G1610T is 1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306a9
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
February 2011
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2410M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.34k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
6.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
3k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
2.74k (x0.87)
TOTAL
15.62k
14.62k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-2410M

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
4.67k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
14.39k
12.66k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.95k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.53k (x0.82)
TOTAL
31.35k
25.8k (x0.82)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
7.87k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
7.14k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.04k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
2.79k (x1.03)
TOTAL
20.52k
20.84k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-2410M

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
15.12k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
14.05k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
5.94k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.48k (x1.15)
TOTAL
36.9k
38.59k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4