| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Athlon II X2 260


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 260 is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.3 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
100f63
Core
Sandy Bridge
Regor
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
February 2011
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
27.54k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
260
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
6.04k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
6.2k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.11k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
1.7k (x0.63)
TOTAL
20.52k
17.05k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-2410M

260
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
10.02k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
10.18k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
5.1k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.25k (x0.74)
TOTAL
36.9k
27.54k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
260
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
260
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4