| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Athlon 5150 APU


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.3 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
700f01
Core
Sandy Bridge
Kabini
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
AM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
30.06k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2410M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
7.38k
3.02k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
6.76k
2.62k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
1.59k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
1.02k (x0.38)
TOTAL
20.1k
8.26k (x0.41)

Multithread

i5-2410M

5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
14.17k
12.06k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
14.71k
10.42k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
6.32k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.87k
1.26k (x0.44)
TOTAL
38.68k
30.06k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
420 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
198 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1105 points/W
1203 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2543 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2332 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1139 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
917 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
6932 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4