| | | | | | |

Core i5-2400 vs i7-6700HQ


Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 145.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 1.7 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
506e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
50.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
205.24k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2400
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.16k
11.23k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
16.98k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
4.21k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
7.07k (x1.69)
TOTAL
25.49k
39.49k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-2400

i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
34.74k
44.59k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
31.07k
75.02k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
20.15k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
5.92k (x1.6)
TOTAL
84.36k
145.68k (x1.73)

Performance/W
i5-2400
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
366 points/W
991 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
327 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
888 points/W
3237 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2400
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2695 points/GHz
3208 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2411 points/GHz
4853 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1163 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1228 points/GHz
2021 points/GHz
TOTAL
7497 points/GHz
11284 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4