| | | | | | |

Core i5-2400 vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 143.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
706e5
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2400
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.72k
4.05k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
7.6k
15.29k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
9.04k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
10.54k (x2.36)
TOTAL
18.78k
38.92k (x2.07)

Multithread

i5-2400

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.37k
9.05k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
28.84k
33.88k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
15.34k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.67k
6.74k (x1.44)
TOTAL
58.95k
65.01k (x1.1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2400
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.16k
13.9k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
20.13k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
9.41k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
10.59k (x2.54)
TOTAL
25.49k
54.03k (x2.12)

Multithread

i5-2400

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
34.74k
55.4k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
31.07k
59.01k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
22.83k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
6.7k (x1.81)
TOTAL
84.36k
143.94k (x1.71)

Performance/W
i5-2400
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
366 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
327 points/W
3934 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
1522 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
888 points/W
9596 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2400
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2695 points/GHz
3757 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2411 points/GHz
5440 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1163 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1228 points/GHz
2862 points/GHz
TOTAL
7497 points/GHz
14601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4