| | | | | | |

Core i5-2400 vs i3-3217U


Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the i3-3217U gets 35.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306a9
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
95 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2011
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
16.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
35.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2400
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.72k
1.79k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
7.6k
5.02k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.21k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
2.31k (x0.52)
TOTAL
18.78k
11.32k (x0.6)

Multithread

i5-2400

i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.37k
3.56k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
28.84k
11.47k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
5.34k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.67k
2.54k (x0.54)
TOTAL
58.95k
22.91k (x0.39)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2400
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.16k
5.83k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
5.79k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
2.22k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
2.26k (x0.54)
TOTAL
25.49k
16.09k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-2400

i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
34.74k
12.53k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
31.07k
14.19k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
5.63k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.46k (x0.94)
TOTAL
84.36k
35.81k (x0.42)

Performance/W
i5-2400
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
366 points/W
737 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
327 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
331 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
204 points/W
TOTAL
888 points/W
2107 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2400
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
2695 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2411 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1163 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1228 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
7497 points/GHz
8942 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4