| | | | | | |

Core i5-2400 vs i3-10105


Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 195.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2011
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2400
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.72k
4.5k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
7.6k
18.39k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
5.78k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
8.3k (x1.86)
TOTAL
18.78k
36.97k (x1.97)

Multithread

i5-2400

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
10.37k
16.13k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
28.84k
75.62k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
27.88k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.67k
3.57k (x0.77)
TOTAL
58.95k
123.2k (x2.09)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2400
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.16k
16.11k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
24.12k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
5.71k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
7.89k (x1.89)
TOTAL
25.49k
53.83k (x2.11)

Multithread

i5-2400

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
34.74k
58.25k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
31.07k
105.73k (x3.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
27.8k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.51k (x0.95)
TOTAL
84.36k
195.29k (x2.31)

Performance/W
i5-2400
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
366 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
327 points/W
1627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
888 points/W
3004 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2400
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2695 points/GHz
3662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2411 points/GHz
5481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1163 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1228 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
7497 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4