Core i5-2400 vs M-5Y10c
Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.7 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.7 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
306d4
Core
Sandy Bridge
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2011
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2400
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
9.16k
7.22k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
9.98k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
2.75k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
2.98k (x0.71)
TOTAL
25.49k
22.93k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-2400
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
34.74k
15.07k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
31.07k
24.8k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
6.68k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
4.46k (x1.21)
TOTAL
84.36k
51k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i5-2400
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
366 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
327 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
888 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2400
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
2695 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2411 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1163 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1228 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
7497 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4