Core i5-2400 vs Celeron J4105
Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.4 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.4 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
706a1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2011
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
61.49k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.72k
1.68k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
7.6k
5.29k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.75k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
3.44k (x0.77)
TOTAL
18.78k
13.16k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-2400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
10.37k
6.39k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
28.84k
20.02k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
10.22k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.67k
4.94k (x1.06)
TOTAL
58.95k
41.57k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i5-2400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
109 points/W
639 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
304 points/W
2002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
494 points/W
TOTAL
620 points/W
4157 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
801 points/GHz
673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2236 points/GHz
2116 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1171 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1316 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
5523 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4