Core i5-2320 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2320 gets a score of 66.5 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 9.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2320 gets a score of 66.5 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 9.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
306e4
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
12 /24
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2011
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
24.01k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.48k points
633.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2320
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.88k
10.53k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
9.98k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.79k
4k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.4k (x0.97)
TOTAL
24.01k
27.92k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-2320
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
27.98k
247.05k (x8.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
264.43k (x10.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.42k
111.01k (x9.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
10.66k (x4.09)
TOTAL
66.48k
633.14k (x9.52)
Performance/W
i5-2320
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
295 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
258 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
700 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2320
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2689 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2375 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1063 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
7277 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4