| | | | | | |

Core i5-2320 vs i3-7100


Description
The i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2320 gets a score of 66.5 k points while the i3-7100 gets 100.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
906e9
Core
Sandy Bridge
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2011
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
24.01k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.48k points
124.8k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2320
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.88k
14.41k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
22.38k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.79k
5.45k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.96k (x1.41)
TOTAL
24.01k
47.21k (x1.97)

Multithread

i5-2320

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.98k
30.48k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
52.08k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.42k
12.97k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
4.56k (x1.75)
TOTAL
66.48k
100.1k (x1.51)

Performance/W
i5-2320
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
295 points/W
598 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
258 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
700 points/W
1963 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2320
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2689 points/GHz
3695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2375 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1063 points/GHz
1273 points/GHz
TOTAL
7277 points/GHz
12105 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4