| | | | | | |

Core i5-2320 vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2320 gets a score of 66.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
806c1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2011
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
24.01k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.48k points
137.96k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2320
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.88k
14.65k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
21.57k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.79k
9.93k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
8.02k (x2.29)
TOTAL
24.01k
54.18k (x2.26)

Multithread

i5-2320

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
27.98k
32.14k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
43.54k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.42k
19.58k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
5.61k (x2.15)
TOTAL
66.48k
100.87k (x1.52)

Performance/W
i5-2320
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
295 points/W
1148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
258 points/W
1555 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
699 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
200 points/W
TOTAL
700 points/W
3602 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2320
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2689 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2375 points/GHz
5262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1063 points/GHz
1956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7277 points/GHz
13214 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4