| | | | | | |

Core i5-2300 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i5-2300 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2300 gets a score of 79.5 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2300 is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
810f10
Core
Sandy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
24.53k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.46k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2300
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.52k
2.63k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
7.01k
7.84k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.77k
3.63k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
2.93k (x0.69)
TOTAL
17.53k
17.02k (x0.97)

Multithread

i5-2300

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.46k
5.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
26.25k
24.15k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
9.28k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.83k (x0.9)
TOTAL
52.93k
42.02k (x0.79)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2300
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.65k
11.54k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
7.8k
19.69k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.92k
4.55k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.16k
3.25k (x0.78)
TOTAL
24.53k
39.03k (x1.59)

Multithread

i5-2300

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
19.25k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
29.25k
36.27k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.64k
10.2k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
3.07k (x0.98)
TOTAL
79.46k
68.8k (x0.87)

Performance/W
i5-2300
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
308 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
154 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
836 points/W
4586 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2300
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2791 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2516 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1263 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1343 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7912 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4