Core i5-10600K vs i7-9750H
Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 352.9 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 352.9 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
73.05k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.88k points
276.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.11k
25.22k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
21.97k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
5.02k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.77k
10.71k (x0.99)
TOTAL
73.05k
62.92k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10600K
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
158.82k
125.56k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
150.39k
115.86k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.56k
25.63k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.11k
9.4k (x1.32)
TOTAL
352.88k
276.46k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i5-10600K
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1271 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6273 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5449 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1252 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2243 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
15218 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4