Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.09k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
365.67k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
30.27k
16.85k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.42k
26.03k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.07k
9.54k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.33k
22.55k (x1.99)
TOTAL
74.09k
74.97k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-10600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
164.69k
229.41k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
156.45k
292.81k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.39k
128.48k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.15k
36.8k (x5.15)
TOTAL
365.67k
687.5k (x1.88)
Performance/W
i5-10600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
1317 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1252 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
2925 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6306 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5505 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
15436 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4