Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.09k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
365.67k points
558.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.27k
24.14k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.42k
26.3k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.07k
12.09k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.33k
26.54k (x2.34)
TOTAL
74.09k
89.07k (x1.2)
Multithread
i5-10600K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
164.69k
183.54k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
156.45k
237.27k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.39k
107.95k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.15k
29.66k (x4.15)
TOTAL
365.67k
558.42k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i5-10600K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1317 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1252 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
2925 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6306 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5505 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
15436 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4