Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 352.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 352.9 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
73.05k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.88k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
30.11k
17.57k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
27.38k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
9.35k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.77k
23.9k (x2.22)
TOTAL
73.05k
78.2k (x1.07)
Multithread
i5-10600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
158.82k
176.08k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
150.39k
219.88k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.56k
100k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.11k
12.93k (x1.82)
TOTAL
352.88k
508.89k (x1.44)
Performance/W
i5-10600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1271 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6273 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5449 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1252 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2243 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
15218 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4