| | | | | | |

Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 352.9 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
73.05k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.88k points
410.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.11k
15.02k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
24.26k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.01k
5.53k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.77k
16.26k (x1.51)
TOTAL
73.05k
61.07k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-10600K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
158.82k
122.92k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
150.39k
220.32k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.56k
59.78k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.11k
7.44k (x1.05)
TOTAL
352.88k
410.47k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i5-10600K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1271 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6273 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5449 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1252 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2243 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
15218 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4