| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-9700F


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 245.7 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.67k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
17.16k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.7k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
14.37k (x1.18)
TOTAL
36.89k
41.9k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
26.31k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
97.53k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
31.53k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
8.94k (x2.39)
TOTAL
161.83k
164.31k (x1.02)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
16.8k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
24.08k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
6.06k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
13.98k (x1.23)
TOTAL
50.7k
60.93k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
92.79k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
135.13k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
33.29k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
8.64k (x2.32)
TOTAL
245.75k
269.85k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
2348 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3550 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1017 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
7021 points/W
4152 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3669 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5267 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3002 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
13341 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4