| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-8750H


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
231.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.01k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
11.68k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
3.78k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
5.64k (x0.47)
TOTAL
36.89k
24.12k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
7.4k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
29.99k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
9.66k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
5.12k (x1.37)
TOTAL
161.83k
52.18k (x0.32)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
15.14k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
22.8k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.5k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
10.97k (x0.96)
TOTAL
51.82k
54.41k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
82.81k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
118.58k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
25.08k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
4.86k (x1.31)
TOTAL
233.94k
231.34k (x0.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
22.36k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
19.33k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.4k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
7.32k (x0.61)
TOTAL
64.6k
53.41k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
103.82k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
100.47k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
23.81k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.8k (x1.02)
TOTAL
302.13k
231.9k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
2307 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
2233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
529 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
5153 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5454 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1073 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1786 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
13027 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4