| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-6700


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6700 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
57.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
243.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
24.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
21.82k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.98k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
6.14k (x0.51)
TOTAL
64.6k
57.76k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
109.79k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
102.39k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
24.72k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
6.51k (x1.74)
TOTAL
302.13k
243.4k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
1575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
3745 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6206 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4