| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-3930K


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-3930K is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 233.9 k points while the i7-3930K gets 155.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.5 times faster than the i7-3930K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2011
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
27.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
155.86k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-3930K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
10.08k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
9.06k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
4.45k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
4.16k (x0.36)
TOTAL
51.82k
27.76k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-3930K
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
62.22k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
60.25k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
30.42k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
2.97k (x0.8)
TOTAL
233.94k
155.86k (x0.67)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-3930K
Test#1 (Integers)
2354 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3304 points/W
463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/W
234 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
6684 points/W
1199 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-3930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3687 points/GHz
2653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5571 points/GHz
2383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3005 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
TOTAL
13636 points/GHz
7304 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4